Leadership
Innovation at WSU
Research
Directories
Give to WSU
myWSU
OneStop
Quick Links
Close Menu
Search
Close Menu
ACADEMICS
ADMISSIONS
STUDENT LIFE
ATHLETICS
ABOUT
APPLY NOW
Leadership
Innovation at WSU
Research
Directories
Give to WSU
myWSU
OneStop
Academic Calendar
Apply Now!
A-Z Directory
Blackboard
Calendar of Events
Careers and Employment
Office Hours
Policies and Procedures
Schedule of Courses
Shocker Store
Student Webmail
Technology HelpDesk
Transfer to WSU
University Libraries
Search
Close Menu
ACADEMICS
ADMISSIONS
STUDENT LIFE
ATHLETICS
ABOUT
APPLY NOW
Undergraduate Research Experience (URE) - Faculty Survey
Section Menu
(Back to Engineering Home)
(Back to Student Success Home)
SEA Overview
Research Application Process
URE Faculty Survey
URE Project Descriptions
URE Milestone Status Update
2023 DRAFT Welcome Week Schedule
Shocker Engineering Academy Application
Shocker Engineering Academy - 2024 Schedule
SEA Participant Requirements
SEA Participant Requirements
If you see this don't fill out this input box.
Thank you for providing College of Engineering undergrad students the opportunity to participate in a research project during 2021.
We are starting the process to offer projects for 2022 and make assignments and would like your input regarding any issues experienced, or suggestions that can make the program better.
Please take a few minutes to reflect on our process for selecting the students we used last year and provide your thoughts.
Thank you,
Ana Lazarin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please indicate the project(s) that are being evaluated
*
Monowar Hasan/Erick Oduniyi - Machine Learning for Real Time Edge Computing
Dr. Hongsheng He/Cecilia Martinez - Instruction Understanding and Robot Planning
Dr. Yimesker Yihun/Clarissa Rincon - Assessment of exoskeletons for Rehabilitation
Sergio Salinas Monroy/Sriram Srinivasan - Automated Open Source Intelligence Collection
Dr. Moriah Beck/Noely Urbina - Improving personalized medicine
Monowar Hasan/Chidera Okoro - Sandboxing Unmanned Robotic Vehicles
Wei Wei/Ashley Bland - Explore Electrodes for Energy Storage Devices
Yongkuk Lee/Anna Tri - Inkjet-Printed Ultrathin Stretchable Electronics
Dr. Kapildeb Ambal/Tyler Nolan - Understanding the physics of nanomagnets
Yang-Seon Kim/Darryl Moorehead - Developing energy efficient building systems
Atri Dutta/Asutosh Panda - Cislunar mission analysis using NASA GMAT Tool
Suresh Keshavanarayana/Carlos Gatti - Energy Absorption of 3D printed Lattice Structures
Suresh Keshavanarayana/Kazune Tazawa - Pure bending of Honeycomb Cores
Dr. Kapildeb Ambal/Tiylar Cotton - Understanding the physics of nanomagnets
Laila Cure/Ranveer Bhalla - Food system modeling
Dr. Kapildeb Ambal/Thane Unruh - Understanding the physics of nanomagnets
Dr. Hongsheng He/Alayna Boykin - Instruction Understanding and Robot Planning
Eylem Asmatulu/Emanuel Andrade - Improving Flame Resistance of Aircraft Interiors
You may select multiple projects if you mentored mentored multiple students.
Regarding the project(s) for which you had an undergrad assistant, what percentage 'complete' is the research project at this time?
*
100% complete
75% complete
50% complete
25% complete
0% complete
Regarding the process we used in 2021 to match faculty and projects to students (collecting student's ranked choices, allowing faculty to rank the students interested in their projects, COE making the assignment), using a scale of 0 (lowest) to 5 (highest) please rate your overall impression of the process we used?
*
5 - the process worked well, no issues encountered, the student assigned was a good fit
4 - ran into a few minor issues, the student wasn't a right fit for the project, or too much time was required to participate in the selection to be beneficial to the project, still met objectives
3 - met some of the expectations, but not enough benefit for the investment
2 - met a few of the expectations, issues encountered were detrimental to progress on the research
1 - didn't meet any of the expectations
Please provide any suggestions or issues you would like considered in the 2022 application effort.
Overall, how did you feel the the project went?
Excellent - met all objectives/expectations or exceeded them
Satisfied - met the objectives but took more oversite or other intervention to achieve the goals
Not Satisfied - some objectives of the project were not met
What a disaster - won't participate in this again
Please provide any other input, suggestions, accolades, anything you want us to consider as we start the 2022 cycle. We appreciate your thoughts!
Form UUID
Site Name
Submit Input
©